One of the features of modern culture, the culture of the late twentieth century to the present, is the struggle against the dogmas of classical interpretation in all forms of art. Yes, we all know the plays "Romeo and Juliet" by Baz Luhrmann, "Hamlet" by Michael Almereid "transferred to our time" by means of cinematography (in general, these are not the only, but the most striking examples); also, directors and screenwriters "finished" offshoots of the plots of classical works. As an example, Tom Stoppard's 1990 film "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead", which took place "behind the scenes" of Hamlet; a similar project was implemented in 2019 by director Claire McCarthy, in the film "Ophelia" - focusing on the character of the same name in Shakespeare's play.
So, the tape for us presents an "expanded" and "alternative" story of the girl Ophelia, based on the novel by the writer Lisa Klein, the daughter of Polonius, the sister of Laertes and Hamlet's beloved. Of course, here she is the central character, whose story has been told since childhood, a maid of honor to Queen Gertrude, a "white crow" among the great entourage, in love with nature, not a beauty of model appearance, but her charm involuntarily managed to conquer the Prince of Denmark. Both heroes must figure out the intrigues of Claudius, the queen herself - and compete for their happiness to the last.
This film is distinguished by a certain theatricality, it feels more theater than cinema itself. The latter expands our set of decorations, which, unlike theatrical props, have become full-scale by means of cinema - and this is the river, these are the real rooms of the castle, the dirty streets of medieval times; separately, we can focus on the simply incredible costumes of the characters. The theater "presented" the tape with long, detailed, often rhymed dialogues and monologues, specific scenes, and in general - not the very high dynamics of events that unfolds throughout the film. In general, it is often difficult for the viewer to understand - is it more cinema or theater, especially when the accumulation of "assumptions" becomes not quite logical?
The actors' game. The performer of the main role Daisy Ridley coped with the task perfectly, as did Naomi Watts, who embodied two images - Gertrude and the witch Mechthild, as well as Clive Owen in the role of Claudius, as well as George McKay, embodying Hamlet, as well as the supporting actors...
About the output. "Ophelia" is not a dynamic Hollywood movie, and at once not a frivolous fantasy of the theater. This is still a more theatrical movie, it will bring theater-goers and moviegoers who are not indifferent to the "pure" theater back to the cinema halls, but it will not satisfy adherents of action and adventure films made "according to the pattern". Enter the world of magicreels and discover a new level of online casino games. The site offers a perfect blend of entertainment and excitement for all players.
So, the tape for us presents an "expanded" and "alternative" story of the girl Ophelia, based on the novel by the writer Lisa Klein, the daughter of Polonius, the sister of Laertes and Hamlet's beloved. Of course, here she is the central character, whose story has been told since childhood, a maid of honor to Queen Gertrude, a "white crow" among the great entourage, in love with nature, not a beauty of model appearance, but her charm involuntarily managed to conquer the Prince of Denmark. Both heroes must figure out the intrigues of Claudius, the queen herself - and compete for their happiness to the last.
This film is distinguished by a certain theatricality, it feels more theater than cinema itself. The latter expands our set of decorations, which, unlike theatrical props, have become full-scale by means of cinema - and this is the river, these are the real rooms of the castle, the dirty streets of medieval times; separately, we can focus on the simply incredible costumes of the characters. The theater "presented" the tape with long, detailed, often rhymed dialogues and monologues, specific scenes, and in general - not the very high dynamics of events that unfolds throughout the film. In general, it is often difficult for the viewer to understand - is it more cinema or theater, especially when the accumulation of "assumptions" becomes not quite logical?
The actors' game. The performer of the main role Daisy Ridley coped with the task perfectly, as did Naomi Watts, who embodied two images - Gertrude and the witch Mechthild, as well as Clive Owen in the role of Claudius, as well as George McKay, embodying Hamlet, as well as the supporting actors...
About the output. "Ophelia" is not a dynamic Hollywood movie, and at once not a frivolous fantasy of the theater. This is still a more theatrical movie, it will bring theater-goers and moviegoers who are not indifferent to the "pure" theater back to the cinema halls, but it will not satisfy adherents of action and adventure films made "according to the pattern". Enter the world of magicreels and discover a new level of online casino games. The site offers a perfect blend of entertainment and excitement for all players.